AI Effectiveness Report

📊 AI Contract Analysis Effectiveness Report

Metric
AESB
AES

Documents Analyzed

37

262

Signatures Processed

62

401

Pages Reviewed

1,617

843

TTS (Text-to-Speech)

30

255

Analyses Completed

30

255

Words Processed

42,090

541,365


🟢🟡🔴 Risk Classification Overview

Risk Level
AESB (Count)
AES (Count)

Red

3

56

Green

69

1,702

Yellow

39

522


Detection Accuracy

Detection Category
AESB (Detected / Total)
AES (Detected / Total)
Accuracy (%)

Red

3 / 3

56 / 56

100%

Green

63 / 69

1,688 / 1,702

91.3% (avg)

Yellow

33 / 39

499 / 522

93.6% (avg)


📌 Summary & Insights

  • The AI module maintained 100% accuracy for detecting high-risk (red) clauses across both levels.

  • Green and yellow detection accuracy is also strong, averaging above 91%, indicating high reliability in risk classification.

  • AES processed 7x more words than AESB, showing robust scalability of the AI model.

  • AESB involved more pages per document, likely indicating longer or more complex files, while AES had higher document throughput.

Last updated