AI Effectiveness Report
📊 AI Contract Analysis Effectiveness Report
Metric
AESB
AES
Documents Analyzed
37
262
Signatures Processed
62
401
Pages Reviewed
1,617
843
TTS (Text-to-Speech)
30
255
Analyses Completed
30
255
Words Processed
42,090
541,365
🟢🟡🔴 Risk Classification Overview
Risk Level
AESB (Count)
AES (Count)
Red
3
56
Green
69
1,702
Yellow
39
522
✅ Detection Accuracy
Detection Category
AESB (Detected / Total)
AES (Detected / Total)
Accuracy (%)
Red
3 / 3
56 / 56
100%
Green
63 / 69
1,688 / 1,702
91.3% (avg)
Yellow
33 / 39
499 / 522
93.6% (avg)
📌 Summary & Insights
The AI module maintained 100% accuracy for detecting high-risk (red) clauses across both levels.
Green and yellow detection accuracy is also strong, averaging above 91%, indicating high reliability in risk classification.
AES processed 7x more words than AESB, showing robust scalability of the AI model.
AESB involved more pages per document, likely indicating longer or more complex files, while AES had higher document throughput.
Last updated